15 June 2014

How Did We Get in this Mess in the First Place????

June 14, 2014

7 Quotes From Bush, Blair And Co On How Invading Iraq Would Help Us Beat Al Qaeda

Huffington Post UK

June 13, 2014


It wasn’t just about WMDs. Among the main justifications cited for the assault on Baghdad in 2003, without UN authorisation, were the alleged ties between Saddam Hussein and Osama Bin Laden and the supposed presence of al Qaeda operatives on the ground in Iraq.

Senior US officials fell over another to claim a ‘linkage’ between Saddam and OBL and suggested an invasion of Iraq would help reduce the threat from al Qaeda-inspired terrorism. Iraq, it was argued by the hawks, was just another front of the ongoing ‘War on Terror’.

In January 2004, however, the independent 9/11 Commission found no evidence of a “collaborative relationship” between Iraq and al Qaeda.

The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace concluded, also in January 2004, that “the most intensive searching over the last two years has produced no solid evidence of a co-operative relationship between Saddam Hussein’s government and al Qaeda.”

Most intelligence analysts and terrorism experts have since argued that the invasion of Iraq acted as a recruiting sergeant for al Qaeda-types, who turned the country into a safe haven and training ground. The war, in the words of former MI5 boss Dame Eliza Manningham-Buller, “increased the terror threat”.

Today, Isis, an offshoot of Al Qaeda - or, rather, a group too extreme and violenteven for the fanatics of al Qaeda - is on the rise in Iraq, has captured the country’s second-biggest city, Mosul, and is preparing to march on Baghdad.

So, to be clear: al Qaeda wasn’t hiding out in Iraq, or working with Saddam, prior to the Anglo-American invasion and occupation. Eleven years on, however, al Qaeda-inspired forces are in physical control of hundreds of square miles of Iraqi territory and Saddam’s former generals are reported to be involved in their insurgency. The words ‘self’, fulfilling’ and ‘prophecy’ come to mind.

Or as Middle East analyst Trita Parsi tweeted: “Irony = The very Baathist-AlQaeda marriage Bush falsely cited to justify Iraq war is now a reality (ISIS).”

Let’s take a trip down memory lane…
1
US President George Bush, September 2002

"The regime has longstanding and continuing ties to terrorist groups, and there are Al Qaida terrorists inside Iraq."
2
US President George Bush, November 2002

"This is a man who has got connections with Al Qaida. Imagine a terrorist network with Iraq as an arsenal and as a training ground.."
3
US Vice-President Dick Cheney, December 2002

"His regime has had high-level contacts with al Qaeda going back a decade and has provided training to al Qaeda terrorists."
4
US National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, September 2002

"There clearly are contacts between al Qaeda and Iraq that can be documented; there clearly is testimony that some of the contacts have been important contacts and that there’s a relationship here".
5
US Secretary of State Colin Powell, February 2003

"Ambition and hatred are enough to bring Iraq and al Qaeda together".
6
US Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, November 2002

"Within a week, or a month, Saddam could give his WMD to al-Qaeda."
7
And then there was our own Tony Blair, February 2003

"There are unquestionably links between al Qaida and Iraq."


Well, Tony (and George and Dick).. there are now..

No comments: