17 October 2016

FDI: Fiscal fallout of crossing the LoC

By Ajit Ranade
Oct 03, 2016

For the past two years India has received record inflows of foreign direct investment. The inbound FDI has exceeded the foreign portfolio inflow into the stock and bond markets. This is called the FII inflow, which typically has a shorter time horizon, and is considered more volatile. FDI inflows on the other hand signify confidence in the longer-term growth prospects. Adjusted for their respective economic size, India received more FDI than China, relatively speaking. In these two years India’s global rank has jumped up on three different and important metrics. Its Ease of Doing Business rank, as computed by the World Bank is up. Its competitiveness rank as determined by the World Economic Forum has jumped up by 16 ranks. And its rank on the innovation index as per World Intellectual Property Organisation is up by 15 ranks. These rankings may be a testimony to the improving health of the macro economy, its growth prospects and the progress of economic reforms. Average inflation now is half of what it was just three years ago. Foreign exchange reserves are at record highs. Fiscal deficit limits are being adhered to, indicating tight fiscal management.

In addition to these factors are five short-term positives for the economy. Firstly, due to adequate rainfall, agriculture and the rural economy are expected to do well. Even the rabi crop will be better. Secondly, the award of the arrears of the seventh Pay Commission will add almost one percent of GDP to urban incomes (since the beneficiaries are predominantly in urban areas). This will give a boost to consumption spending. Thirdly, the continuing push in public spending on infrastructure like roads, ports and railways is beginning to manifest in a stimulus impact. It will lead to increase in the consumption of steel and cement and an increase in unskilled and semi-skilled employment. Fourthly, going by trends it looks likely that inflation and interest rates will drift downwards, further adding monetary stimulus to the recovering business cycle.

Of course not everything is rosy. Exports are still struggling, and nowhere near the double-digit growth of five years ago. Industrial growth needs to pick up speed. Banks are still under the crushing burden of bad and stressed loans. Private sector investment in large projects is not visible. But all these specific problem areas are expected to improve in the coming months and years. The rollout of Goods and Services Tax is a net positive for the economy, and so are a slew of other reforms.

Into this relatively benign and improving economic scenario, suddenly we have the military move of crossing the Line of Control. India’s action was in retaliation to the terrorist attack on Uri camp, where nineteen personnel were killed. This terrorist attack prompted India to deviate from its dominant policy of “strategic restraint”. India’s military intervention, termed as a surgical strike, was swift, pinpointed and unexpected. It was simultaneously aimed at several terrorist camps on the other side of the LOC. Technically that area is disputed, and claimed by India. So it cannot really be deemed an attack on Pakistan’s sovereignty or an act of war. Even the framing of the retaliation as a “surgical strike” was diplomatic. Hence the operation was both a military and diplomatic success. And it has put pressure on Pakistan to do something about such camps on its soil.

That’s where it gets complicated. The short-term tactical success has opened up longer term uncertainty. What is the economic impact of crossing the line? During Kargil and shortly thereafter, America reacted by labelling this part of South Asia one of the most dangerous neighbourhoods in the world. The allusion was to a situation where two countries with nuclear arms were on the brink of war with each other. But the United States then went on to give substantial military support to Pakistan, and continued to do so even post 9/11. This assessment proved to be off the mark and incorrect as in just six years from Kargil, India signed a nuclear deal with America. The nuclear sanctions of 1998 were forgotten and since the nuclear deal, India’s relations with the United States have gone from strength to strength.

But the current hostilities add an element uncertainty in the minds of investors. This was seen on the day of the surgical strike itself. Global stock markets rallied, and the Indian stock market too should have moved in sync, as always. But the Sensex actually fell by 500 points during the day. The rupee exchange rate too looked like it was going to crash. Of course this can be seen as a knee jerk reaction. Investors abhor uncertainty, be it from elections, monsoon, budget announcements, and most of all from geopolitical tensions.

While FII inflows might become volatile and slow down, we need to see how the FDI flows react. However though India’s economic fundamentals remain strong, a lot of the country’s resources may get used in security operations. Investors would be more worried about how much political capital (not fiscal resources) gets diverted to solving the cross border tension. Will policy makers who are focused on development issues now get too distracted by the challenge of containing the fallout of the military action? More importantly, how will the Pakistan establishment react, since unfortunately this is seen as a zero-sum game. Wounded pride or a perceived snub can have unpredictable and even irrational responses.

Ultimately, this is an inevitable economic consequence of crossing the line of control. The government officials have done well by keeping quiet and maintaining restraint in the aftermath, letting mostly the military brass address the press. The wording and communication has been well crafted. Global perceptions, including those of investors are being addressed and managed. There is much work to be done on the economy, and the ambitious GST deadline looms large. But we can’t deny that we are in uncharted territory. Low oil prices, a very good monsoon, and a remarkable national consensus around GST – have all been a story of good political and economic fortune for the country. But we need to keep our fingers crossed as events unfold after crossing the line.

The writer is a senior economist based in Mumbai.

No comments: